VMProtect is the best uncrackable protection without hardware.

I think flexlm with ECC is the best.

snpslmd.exe daemon

My vote goes toward VMProtect.

WmProtect can be unpacked with LCF-AT Vmprotect 1.xx - 2.xx Ultra Unpacker V1.0.... thanks to LCF-AT.

mix your experience in RE with Coding then you will make an uncrackable soft :d

starforce the best for me and too hard ! also i will keep it private
But One day a friend Told me this : What ever is executed IS CAN BE CRACKED (he have cracked ZENON 7 !

Hi p4r4d0x
"What ever is executed IS CAN BE CRACKED"; not always.

For all practical concerns, the statement "Whatever is executed can be cracked" is correct. However, from a more theoretical perspective, a protection based on homomorphic encryption is in principle not crackable, only its input and output are observable. For specific cases this can yield an uncrackable (i.e. not understable) mechanism.

Protection builded on WhiteBox technology

where i can get software + medicine?

For your concern ... what is made by man hands will be "broken" also by mans hand.
So i think is no "uncrackable" protection.
Just hard to bypass or reverse.
It just require lots of knowledge and hard work.
All software protections are down at the moment.
Most of the hardware protections can be emulated, bypassed.
I think the private solutions for the protections exists in every passionate reverser.
Most of the strong protections solutions are kept in private so from here the impresion that a protection is "uncrackable".
I think the discusion is futile.
The thread subject is, IMHO, what is the hardest software protection not "uncrackable".
;)

Well, as I said that's not technically correct. Counter examples include homomorphic encryption which is provably secure with respect to what information can be extracted from the code using static/dynamics analysis.
Also, take crypto systems such as RSA or AES, those were built "by man" as well. By your logic you should be able to break any instance of it. That's obviously not true.

Depends on the time and resources only. They are secure enough from the current point of view. BTW, for practical reasons RSA le 512 is insecure. AES is also not secure in some cases, including pure WBAES.
homomorphic encryption looks nice as theory, but there are no existing implementations.

Sure, but his general statement is not true for all practical concerns. Or to put it differently: I can construct an instance which you won't be able to crack within the lifetime of our universe.

There are libraries (just google for it), but I haven't seen an implementation that was used for a protection mechanism.