View Single Post
  #2  
Old 10-08-2023, 17:57
NON NON is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 77
Rept. Given: 2
Rept. Rcvd 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks Given: 30
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 16 Posts
NON Reputation: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerotimer View Post
x32dbg and x64dbg are fully FOSS projects right? But I saw that many reversers still cherish olly2. I mean x32dbg is not that bad right?
x32 and x64dbg are based on Qt framework (mainly for their GUI), due to which they are rather slow compared to Olly which is completely based on native API.
On newer machines this slowing is not very apparent but on older machines the lag is quite clearly discernible.

Parsing larger files is noticeably slow on x96dbg. Again, the qt framework is to blame.

If the x96dbg can be coded without the reliance on the qt framework there would be a tremendous improvement in speed nearing that of Olly.
I am not sure if there is enough interest from the community to re-code the x96dbg using only the native API.
Reply With Quote