View Single Post
  #5  
Old 03-10-2024, 07:14
dyers eve dyers eve is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 25
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks Given: 21
Thanks Rcvd at 23 Times in 10 Posts
dyers eve Reputation: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by chants View Post
In the future if you are going to troll with annoying advice, consider not posting. He clearly stated that decryption functioned in a reasonable time. To throw out generic canned nonsense advice like using native code was clearly not what was asked. Although you've been doing this for a while now so it's not surprising.
You are not the only one who knows everything, @chants.
Whether they are right or wrong, is not for you to decide.
While you may have a better answer, if someone else also wants to post their opinions, let them do so!

@eychie It is better to avoid managed frameworks like .Net when you want to optimise for performance. It is also preferable to code the most compute-intensive parts of the encryption in C++ or better yet, in a memory-safe language like Rust.
Is there a good reason why you chose VB.Net instead of C?
I cannot comment further since I cannot access your attachment due to my low rank. I can help with the code if you provide more information, if you need.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dyers eve For This Useful Post:
eychei (03-11-2024)