View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-14-2005, 01:14
TmC TmC is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 330
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 15 Times in 9 Posts
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Rcvd at 23 Times in 17 Posts
TmC Reputation: 15
I think armadillo v4 is more hard. Keys cannot be keygenned and if you use nanomites, import table elimination, memorypatching options, strategic code splicing and copymemII, there are only a few crackers that can crack it. Asprotect has been cracked several times but i haven't seen an unpacked working version of the Armadillo 4.00 private, carded some days ago. So from your point of view armadillo is better.
From ours...asprotect is better.
And this only for the hard or easy part.
You should also consider, like dyn!o said that 10 months does not mean "uncrackable" your software hasn't been cracked because it is not so famous or needed to moove a cracker to look at it and reverse it and unprotect it. Maybe someone cracked it, but because the only one that needed that program was him, he didn't release the crack to the public.
You should also consider your money budget. Upgrading from asprotect v1 to v2 is 49$, buying armadillo is 399$ so it's a huge difference.
Good luck and take your program here for us to crack is and make you happy :P
Reply With Quote