Sorry, everything is ok:
Inside that call there's a pointer pointing
to the return address.
However, there's an AND [pointer],0 executed
which causes that the return address is "removed"
However, it's still a bit strange, cause the return address
is duplicated on the stack. You can say that it is stored
twice.
But when we come to the RET of the call, the stack points
to the old return address which was removed with the AND
I mentioned above....
However, thx for your reply
