![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Extreme crackme for cracker
"I can see,that the 2015 year cracker generation will
measure their knowledge on YOUR protection DD"Well, I think I got something from 2015.It's not Armadillo and the algoritm is very week,but I want only to make your work harder. And I want to recommend it to the cracker named guys... Well,we will see, how can you handle it... The goal is to get the correct serial and register it on my page.I measure thru this registration,who can solve this mistery. So I think with this,It's become a competition. WORKS ONLY ON NT/2000/XP/ AND ABOVE!!! The level of the crackme is 8/10. I made it for crack it,so it's not too hard,but not too easy. By Northfox |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
funny, is that x86-to-text algorithm home made or is there already an existing snippet to do that?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
lifewire: search for shellcode encoders
![]() iirc one was named dissembler. its a long known technique to bypass input restrictions & ids |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting stuff
It run happily on WinXP but crashed on my W2K SP4. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nice crackme
![]() I just have the time to have a very short look at it. What the hell the crackme is doing in the Entrypoint. I just get out of the crackme after tracing 6 instructions ![]() Shellcode? Hmm...never heard of that one. Just found a bit of information and now I know a bit more of it. So, how Windows starts executing that crackme? Anyone familiar with Shellcodes are welcome Regards. Last edited by peleon; 11-02-2004 at 21:45. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dr. Watson Gets an Extreme Makeover | ntwizard | General Discussion | 1 | 05-30-2005 06:07 |