Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2007, 19:48
WaSt3d_ByTes WaSt3d_ByTes is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Rept. Given: 10
Rept. Rcvd 11 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks Given: 42
Thanks Rcvd at 14 Times in 8 Posts
WaSt3d_ByTes Reputation: 11
June 03, 2007 - OllyDBG 2.0 Development Update

The progress in the last two weeks is enormous. List of Extremely Important Things To Do got five items shorter. But news of this kind are roughly equivalent to the summer headlines in the newspapers; now I want to tell you something different.

While testing MinGW compiler, I wrote a small console application:

int main() {
MessageBox(NULL,"I'm a little, little code in a big, big world... Hello, world!",
"Hello, world",MB_OK);
return 0;
}

Highly optimized release version of this code looks this way:

http://ollydbg.de/Pics/helloworld.gif

MinGW reserves space on the stack and moves arguments instead of pushing. But note the following: The order of arguments for MessageBox() is hOwner, Text, Caption, Type. MinGW has changed this order; still, OllyDbg 2 was able to recognize the arguments.

MinGW (in fact, GNU) is an excellent compiler, its only weakness is that many exotic APIs are not yet in the headers.

That's all for this time, bye!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2007, 20:27
Squidge's Avatar
Squidge Squidge is offline
Drunken Squirrel
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 412
Rept. Given: 4
Rept. Rcvd 9 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 6 Times in 6 Posts
Squidge Reputation: 9
Erm, I assume this is something to do with Ollydbg? But with a subject of "June 03, 2007 - Development continues" in the "Software Release" forum, I'm really not sure...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2007, 02:18
Vrane Vrane is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Croatia
Posts: 104
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Vrane Reputation: 0
Quote:
July 08, 2007 - UDD files

Now OllyDbg 2 can save analysis data to the .udd files. Comparing to the previous version, they are very big - two to three times larger, mainly due to the register predictions. For almost every command I keep ESP and EBP relative to the entry point. Many modern compilers don't use standard stack frames; instead, they address all arguments and local data over ESP. Predictions allow to decode the meanings of ESP-related offsets. They are also very helpful when tracing the call stack.

It takes significant time to load such a huge amounts of data. First version took between 0.1 and 0.7 seconds per module. With full analysis of all modules requested (and this will be the default option), startup took several seconds on my Athlon 4000+. Now, after several days of deep optimizations, this time got three times shorter.
hxxp://www.ollydbg.de/version2.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2007, 03:42
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
Moved to General Discussion as there is no "Release."

Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 00:05.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )