.Net Packers Collections

serseri_1453 · #1 05-04-2014, 17:04

Protectors (Obfuscation / Licensing)

Aldaray Rummage Obfuscator
http://www.aldaray.com/
Babel Obfuscator
http://www.babelfor.net/
C# Source Code Obfuscator
http://www.semdesigns.com/products/obfuscators/csharpobfuscator.html
CliSecure(agile.net)
http://www.secureteam.net/index.aspx
CodeArmor .NET
http://www.vilabs.com/
CodeFort Obfuscator
http://codefort.org/
CodeWall Protector
http://www.codewall.com/
Confuser (Opensource)
http://confuser.codeplex.com/
CooProtector .NET Obfuscator
http://www.cooprotector.com
CryptoObfuscator/CryptoLicensing
http://www.ssware.com/cryptoobfuscator/obfuscator-net.htm
DeepSea Obfuscator
http://www.deepseaobfuscator.com/
Demeanor for.NET
http://www.wiseowl.com/products/products.aspx
DeployLX Codeveil/Licensing
http://xheo.com/products/code-protection
DevExtras .NET Obfusasm
http://www.devextras.com/
DNGuard HVM
http://www.dnguard.net/index.aspx
DotFuscator
http://www.preemptive.com/
DotNetSpin (Free)
http://www.pespin.com/
DYAMAR Protector
http://www.dyamar.com/
Eazfuscator.NET (Free)
http://www.foss.kharkov.ua/g1/projects/eazfuscator/dotnet/Default.aspx
ElecKey
http://www.sciensoft.com/
FxProtect
https://www.maycoms.net/
Goliath .NET Obfuscator
http://www.cantelmosoftware.com/eng/obfuscator.html
GuardIT for Microsoft.NET Framework
http://arxan.com/
ILProtector (Free)
http://www.vgrsoft.com/en/products/ilp
Inquartos Obfuscator
http://en.netobf.com/
LSW IL-Obfuscator 2.0
http://www.lesser-software.com/
Manco Obfuscator/Licensing
http://www.mancosoftware.com
MaxtoCode
http://www.maxtocode.com/
NCloak (Opensource)
http://code.google.com/p/ncloak/
NET Reactor/Intellilock
http://www.eziriz.com/
Ntoolbox Yano (Free)
http://www.ntoolbox.com/
Obfuscator.NET 2009
http://www.macrobject.com/en/obfuscator/index.htm
Obfuscar (Opensource)
http://code.google.com/p/obfuscar/
Oxfuscator
http://www.remobjects.com/oxfuscator/
Orange Heap (Free)
http://orangeheap.blogspot.com/
PC Guard for .NET
http://www.sofpro.com/pcgw32.htm
PVLOG dotNet Protector
http://www.pvlog.com/
Phoenix Protector (Free)
http://www.ntcore.com/phoenix.php
Salamander .NET Obfuscator
http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/obfuscator.html
SharpObfuscator (Opensource)
http://sharpobfuscator.codeplex.com/
Skater .net Obfuscator
http://www.rustemsoft.com/
SmartAssembly
http://www.red-gate.com/products/dotnet-development/smartassembly/
Spices.NET Obfuscator
http://www.9rays.net/Category/55-spicesnet-obfuscator.aspx
Starforce .NET Solutions
http://www.star-force.com/solutions/business/
The Enigma Protector
http://www.enigmaprotector.com/
Themida/Winlicense
http://www.oreans.com/

Packers

.netshrink
http://www.pelock.com/products/netshrink
BoxedAppPacker
http://boxedapp.com/boxedapppacker/index.html
Dotpack
https://github.com/daeken/Dotpack/
eXPressor
http://www.cgsoftlabs.ro/
mPRESS
http://matcode.com/
Molebox
www.molebox.com
NETZ Packer
http://madebits.com/netz/index.php
Spoon Virtual application studio (formerly Xenocode Virtual Application Studio)
http://spoon.net/
ThinApp
www.vmware.com/products/thinapp

giv · #2 05-04-2014, 18:08

We must buy license to all of them?

What to do with the list?

serseri_1453 · #3 05-04-2014, 21:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by giv

We must buy license to all of them?

What to do with the list?

License love

Quote:

Originally Posted by s0me0n3

He just took it from another site and copied it to get another post, didn't he? I saw that already pretty much sure.
What a f***er. It just makes me so sad, who is inviting all those idiots these days?

Original taken from here.

My list that I took from the site but packs there is no longer a part of not used or dead links in my re-edit and I shared

s0me0n3 · #4 05-04-2014, 21:06

He just took it from another site and copied it to get another post, didn't he? I saw that already pretty much sure.
What a f***er. It just makes me so sad, who is inviting all those idiots these days?

Original taken from here.

JeRRy · #5 05-06-2014, 17:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by s0me0n3

Original taken from here.

Original is here
http://board.b-at-s.info/index.php?showtopic=8283

copyleft · #6 05-04-2014, 21:17

@s0me0n3
Why to blame ppl. who share knowledge from other sites !!!?
It is not against the rules ....

We all learn from each other and share our knowledge to others. Not a shame
(although it is allways nice to mention the copyright)

giv · #7 05-04-2014, 21:27

What knowledge do you talking?
This is a trash post.
You can Google for that there is no "knowledge" involved.
In this rythm the forum will fall in his head with such users.

s0me0n3 · #8 05-05-2014, 04:20

No offense but do you use the google translator or sth? I feel it's hard to follow you even though english isn't my native either.

Checked 2 of those links and exactly those are bad:
Where can I find

DYAMAR Protector

at all? What about

Eazfuscator.NET (Free)?

I don't consider evaluation versions as free.

So if you want to share knowledge, do it properly. As giv asked, what is this list for in the gereral discussion? License love.
Shall I consider this as an honest reply? I don't get it, it's so troll.

@copyleft:
Yes, maybe some people don't know this list and site but why would you c&p it without writing sth. like
you updated the list from the site, put the link to it. Maybe this could be pinned then as information by the moderators.
As a matter of fact, I see new people spaming thanks and other useless posts every time I visit the forum and look for new ones.
I am tired of reporting them.
I rather have a clean environment with less activity but qualified posts then this
If you check it, you'll notice there are 8 lines missing compared to the 3 years old post from the site he took it from.
Ofc links get outdated during that time but pretty much sure there are also new developments during this time, why didn't he add those (if any)?
If you can help me out and name the purpose of the thread, feel free to do it you want.

AlexAltea · #9 05-05-2014, 05:06

@s0me0n3: You are right, and it's kind of sad to see meaningless threads and posts whose only purpose is to increment the post count.

I think the main problem is to setting those strict limitations that are imposed on new users. I have the feeling that many of them come here just to download something and some of them won't stop writting shitty posts until they get the right to download things (@serseri_1453, I'm *not* talking about you, or this thread or anyone/anything in particular). I don't know why are those restrictions there, probably they are some "protection" mechanism, but I guess it's the cause of such behaviours. IMHO, the quality of the threads would increase without those limitations.

PS: Yeah, I'm a "newbie" too. This is nothing but my personal opinion, I don't pretend increase my counter with this since I don't need to access anything in particular.

alekine322 · #10 05-05-2014, 23:43

Hi

important to note what is listed here.
Many new users, its main purpose is to download the tools that are shared here.
By putting issues that are useless.

I believe that in the opinion of the administrators (from my point of view Excellent), the placement of such issues should not be considered as points users to upload status

Regards

The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to s0me0n3 For This Useful Post:
an0rma1 (05-07-2014), giv (05-04-2014)

The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to JeRRy For This Useful Post:
0xd4d (05-07-2014)