![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
FRAVIA'S "HOW TO PROTECT BETTER"
A good protection is NOT an impossible dream! hxxp://wxw.searchlores.org/protec/protec.htm
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm...don't know if that link is older than me
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
two fast observations
1. quite old material currently not the "state of art" 2. the title says "How to (try to) protect software effectively" .. try to ;-)
__________________
Ŝħůb-Ňìĝùŕřaŧħ ₪) There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't http://www.accessroot.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
the protection is secondary to OS
Those guidelines are good, and could be great, if not running
on the underlying Micro$oft Windows OS. The OS is the biggest weakness aside from sloppy protection design. Even protectionists who try to write there own underlying system calls with special drivers, sys and vxd's are not safe. If it runs on windows, you can make it no fun to reverse, but if someone wants to take the time, windows will let them take it apart. I honestly think many of the highly regarded folks who visit this board know more about the internal workings of Windows than most of Bill Gate's wage slaves who sit in there cubicles and write convoluted code all day long with no sense of direction. If you put many of those protection mantra's in place in a secure OS, or even better, an embedded OS, THEN they may be sufficient to fend off all but the occasional government sponsered agency & honest or not "corporation". ![]() my 2 cents, -BG |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
FRAVIA'S "HOW TO PROTECT BETTER"
A good protection is NOT an impossible dream! hxxp://wxw.searchlores.org/protec/protec.htm Quite possibly appropriate in 1997 ;-). My 2c, but there are many better pages to look at for more current tricks, need I suggest Daemon, Elicz, Z0mbie, this forum and others, my own and about 20 others via your favourite search engine. Regards CrackZ. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
FRAVIA'S "HOW TO PROTECT BETTER"
FRAVIA is gone into searching the web now as all know, those old pages are kept for historic reason!!! but what JMI: CrackZ should be a VIP memeber, or am i Wrong ? Regards |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
He certainly is in my book, but I do not make the usergroup settings rules and only Aaron may make such decisions.
I'm not sure he even wants such a designation, but I would recommend it to Aaron. Regards,
__________________
JMI |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, assuming windowsOS would be coded more clean more "secure" what would it change? the normal user cannot break the usual protections, and would not break better protections, too. But no system could be so good that not even one human will find a way to undermine it.
Example 1: PEiD Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Example 2: the new StarForceProtection was even broken after short time
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DREAM++ decompiler: no more gotos | chants | General Discussion | 0 | 12-28-2017 14:57 |
| Request for a good protection scheme in Java | DaGoN | General Discussion | 7 | 02-20-2014 04:42 |
| Good Protection (Password Reminder) | anorganix | General Discussion | 6 | 11-22-2005 04:42 |