![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I would say more: IMHO that is not even a small step for vm development. It's still only a sample of pure code scrambler. Of course it will complicate reversing, especially when you take memory blocks checksum results as descrambling arguments/parameters or opcodes decryption. Complicate, but for whom? Approximately 95% crackers. There is still 5% left of them and they expect much harder protection. IMHO VM has to operate in own environment (CPU, registers, stack, memory - including structure and communication). Sometimes virtual machines are misunderstand with virtualization but the topic we discuss is not close to virtualisation too (VMWare and VirtualPC are). EDIT: Sorry, I did not notice your question "how vm works then". Well, each one of us can have own definition and imagination but if you want to take a look at vm inside protector then you can take Themida - it contains vm but it resembles x86 (I mean is not very hard to reverse). Question why is another topic, but you can answer it yourself looking at SPARC/PowerPC open source emulators available on the net. Next kind of virtual machines are the ones residing in Atari/ZX/C64/Amiga emulators. They are often "perfect" virtual machines, able to serve as real virtual environment. If we are talking about vm in protections then definitely the best vm resides inside StarForce - it is already a legend. The rest is mystic... Regards. Last edited by dyn!o; 12-08-2006 at 19:15. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| .net modification of a method (without decompilation) | Shub-Nigurrath | General Discussion | 8 | 10-15-2013 21:04 |
| search method passwords | goku | General Discussion | 7 | 07-14-2010 02:15 |
| Protection against point-h method? | TheDutchJewel | General Discussion | 7 | 05-06-2004 01:32 |
| What method to use? | bartster | General Discussion | 11 | 02-08-2004 23:19 |