|
|
|
|
#1
02-08-2017, 17:29
|
|||
|
|||
|
@BlackWhite Why would you? It's more code and it's less efficient. Clearly, there is an infinite amount of additional ways to express this, but there is no advantage in doing so!?
|
|
#2
02-08-2017, 23:23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, setnz is not as efficient as sbb;
yet, it provides a variant way for the job. Since sbb is forgotten by someone, setnz & movsx may also be the case.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hex-Rays and negative structure offsets | jonwil | General Discussion | 3 | 02-20-2019 10:37 |
Hybrid Mode
