![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
couple quick questions about armadillo & codelock...
re: codelock, ok --
so reading about this... is the reason it hasn't been cracked just because there don't appear to be any apps worthy of cracking yet, so no one actually *feels* like cracking it? (i.e., too much time to spend... for what?) or is it that the protection is actually pretty good, and it would just take a really long time? also -- based on what a few ppl have done, does it appear you'd have to crack it on an app per app basis, or possible to write a generic unpacker/uncoupler? as for armadillo, do their extra protections for registered users actually make it difficult (or must be cracked on app per app basis), or can those protections be easily circumvented as well? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rank your "uncrackable" software protection | LaBBa | General Discussion | 114 | 04-29-2024 15:52 |
| WebCops - THE uncrackable protection (?) | aldente | General Discussion | 1 | 11-16-2004 07:07 |
| NEW Armadillo Version said UNCRACKABLE LOL | azaza | General Discussion | 4 | 01-04-2004 17:27 |