|
|
|
|
#1
02-15-2004, 16:31
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can tell you for sure that on my dump, it made no difference at all; I got the same exception at 57891E as I did when it was moving [40781E] to EAX. After all, since both the original code and your suggested change moves 62A43C to EAX, EBX gets the value 77E7AD86 either way, and so 57891E tries to POP/write to kernel32 either way.
Maybe you and I produced different dumps?? I don't know what else could cause your changing the instruction at 578911 to MOV EAX,62A43C to fix the access violation..? Regards 
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| one newbie question | SubzEro | General Discussion | 7 | 03-12-2015 06:05 |
| ASPR, ARMA question | sgdt | General Discussion | 3 | 04-09-2006 03:38 |
| ASPR 1.2 question | gabri3l | General Discussion | 42 | 05-01-2004 15:09 |
| a newbie question about CRC32 | abccc | General Discussion | 13 | 04-23-2004 03:13 |
| "newbie" question for crackers ;) | newbie007 | General Discussion | 4 | 10-07-2003 04:46 |
Hybrid Mode
