![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
@^^
Long discussion on "Xprotector" and interesting. Maybe you have already seen it. http://www.woodmann.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4543 Regards, |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes ok , you are right.
I never have purchased anything but speaking about protectors sorry i think the best protector is XProtector even with some bugs. And why this? Because I DON"T HAVE SEEN ANY UNPACKED VERSION OF IT! Regards |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
XProtector crashed my pc when I run it.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
xprotector was never unpacked because it does not run
*joking*
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
because..
xprotector never got unpacked cos evaluator never got around to it
only way to stop him is put a contract out on him, gotta hate that guy
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
guys..
i'm just poor musician, so can't crash too much my PC because of arrogant protector.. BUT!! if you collect for my some $$ for new PC for me, I will crash&crash it for unpacking xprotector
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Xprotector is quite unstable, really good for crackmes I think, but not for commercial appz.
It adds a heavy overload at your program (and make your program's size incredibly grow), and sometimes neven can be run well. Btw, if you don't add a heavy protection (I mean, not using 2000 de/crypting layers and the other things it can provide), sometimes could be useful. For the discussion about ASprotect vs Armadillo, I can say only that I read some tutes about asprotect's manual unpacking and I found its methods very interesting. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Protection: ASProtect 2 or Armadillo 4? | smartins | General Discussion | 22 | 01-24-2005 04:27 |
| ASProtect 1.23 RC4 - 1.3.08.24 | LaBBa | General Discussion | 1 | 05-13-2004 23:54 |