Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2004, 16:32
kratorius
 
Posts: n/a
Xprotector is quite unstable, really good for crackmes I think, but not for commercial appz.
It adds a heavy overload at your program (and make your program's size incredibly grow), and sometimes neven can be run well. Btw, if you don't add a heavy protection (I mean, not using 2000 de/crypting layers and the other things it can provide), sometimes could be useful.
For the discussion about ASprotect vs Armadillo, I can say only that I read some tutes about asprotect's manual unpacking and I found its methods very interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2004, 18:38
VD76
 
Posts: n/a
yes , ok , xprotector is unstable because it is a very new product.
And this (i think) because it includes some very new characteristics such as the Ring0 binding , that is an "unknown word" for some other protection tools.

Take a look at the whitepaper...it is a very professional project.

Ok , every good project needs time...beta-testing , feedbacks and i believe
that everyone (interested in protection technology) must help good programmers.(this is my personal think)

I am using also , asprotect , armadillo and ok these versions are very very very stable.
They have 99% compatibility.
But these protection tools are available since the last 3-4 years.
And as we can say , the "beta-testing" is already completed.

XProtector as i can remember is only available in the last 1 + year.

But let's see the guys from xprotector team what they will make in the next 1 - 2 years.
After that period , we can again give our positive or negative vote

But again , i don't have seen an unpacked or cracked version and i don't believe that the biggest's minds arround the globe don't have tried to crack it.
Am i right ?

Regards,
VD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2004, 00:07
Crk
 
Posts: n/a
But again , i don't have seen an unpacked or cracked version and i don't believe that the biggest's minds arround the globe don't have tried to crack it.
Am i right ?


this is because is not famous and not used by many programs... you'll see it cracked when it got famous or used by many outhere..... some freaky dumper will arrive for it as the medicine for the "beast" i have seen many Protectors outthere that claims to be the best .. at the end you see it cracked somewhere... anything is not perfect and it's just matter of time for someone to study and analize.. if it runs it can be defeated!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2004, 00:20
D-Jester's Avatar
D-Jester D-Jester is offline
VIP
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 269
Rept. Given: 39
Rept. Rcvd 61 Times in 41 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 4 Times in 4 Posts
D-Jester Reputation: 61
I don't like X-Protector, although their ideas are unique I will give them that.

I hate the fact that they modify INT3 vectors, and from what I have seen of it even after the program has ended the system is unstable.

I would attribute this to the self contained VXD and its SYS counterpart, stay resident in memory, at least I believe so...
__________________
Even as darkness envelops and consumes us, wrapping around our personal worlds like the hand that grips around our necks and suffocates us, we must realize that life really is beautiful and the shadows of despair will scurry away like the fleeting roaches before the light.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Protection: ASProtect 2 or Armadillo 4? smartins General Discussion 22 01-24-2005 04:27
ASProtect 1.23 RC4 - 1.3.08.24 LaBBa General Discussion 1 05-13-2004 23:54


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:06.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )