Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2004, 13:05
tAz
 
Posts: n/a
i don't want to make this long, but i think we both understand each other.

although what you said about learning how to find things for yourself is important in the long run, sometimes, it's still good to share something even though others can find it with google's "i'm feeling lucky" instead of letting them search all over again, and search for it all over again.

sometimes, making them search is good, but other times, sharing the information without any catches is good specially for information sharing.

thanks for your time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-30-2004, 07:29
Star Buck
 
Posts: n/a
WinXP VLK Key boundary limits

mmmhh Well as this topic started about WinXP and it's keys, I hope this post isn't out of place.

The Keygen authors' readme was indeed very intertesting . I did notice that he place VLK limits (for the 640 series which of course IS VLK) between 500 and 600.

I did some checking at work and none of the VLK keys (purchased as recently as last week) are within that range. Mine ( from 3 weeks ago) is around 800000(X) ( not including the last number (X) which I'm assuming is some sort of chcksum) . I wonder what's going to happen to all those "invalid" but legit purchased keys when SP2 arrives ? After reading that SP2 will be more of WINXP SE and it will "break" lots of app's currently out there, I think I'm going to stay away from SP2 for atleast a couple of months after it's release. I don't feel like being a guineapig.


just my 2c

Cheers

Star Buck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2004, 01:40
zdensys
 
Posts: n/a
Star Buck:

There nothing to worry about for the range of VLK. the author might have ramdomly use 500 to 600 to ease the computation to get a key within that range..

Anyway, at least he left the range setting available for all to input their own range..

I've the same though as Satyric0n & rest that the explaination doc is incomplete intentionally.

Seems like someone has managed to find the exact algorithm M$ use for all it product. If it was, such a powerful tool can spell disaster for M$

JMI: BTW, It's a taboo to discuss RE/cracking M$ products here?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2004, 12:14
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
Nope, but they do have the largest force of net police looking for things related to their software.

Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2004, 14:52
zdensys
 
Posts: n/a
If that's the case, did anyone try disassemble the KG into readable code snip here?? or is it not possible?

One thing interesting is that the basic algorithm is the same for the 4 products and the programmer must have managed to find the private key that hash the required product id.. as explained by the text

Maybe just able to lcoate the 4 private key used and the basic algorithm in the code will assist in 'improvement' to the KG..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2004, 19:32
lifewire
 
Posts: n/a
imho is cracking the cracker if you can't crack the original, quite poor.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
who knows how to generates the VENDOR_INFO string from the license key? hanzi General Discussion 6 05-31-2008 03:43
WinXP Activation Did-you-know koncool General Discussion 10 07-10-2003 03:15


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:46.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )