Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2004, 19:14
MaRKuS-DJM's Avatar
MaRKuS-DJM MaRKuS-DJM is offline
Cracker + Unpacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Virtual World / Network
Posts: 553
Rept. Given: 7
Rept. Rcvd 6 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Rcvd at 16 Times in 10 Posts
MaRKuS-DJM Reputation: 6
what about XXXXX-642-0645805-XXXXX product ids?
my key begins with YVGKQ. seems to work
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2004, 01:29
gabri3l's Avatar
gabri3l gabri3l is offline
Parity Error 0x0FF2131D
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 118
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 10 Posts
gabri3l Reputation: 5
I have heard some people installing with a 642 and 648, Some keys fall in that range. But here is the basis of the keys. (I am using someone elses explanation) If you use pirated or legit xp pro vlks check your product ID and your xp product code will look something like this: 55274-64X-XXXXXXX-XXXXX. Look at the ID as this: AAAAA-BBB-CCCCCCC-DDEEE. A is the product code. BBB is a significant number to the private key. C is the least significant of the private key. DD is the private algorithm key used to verify the 25 digit key. EEE is a random digit that changes each install, this is how activation remains random. BBB-CCCCCCC is your hidden product id, which will be within the above stated range if you use a legit microsoft created key. So some xp keys in the 64x range work just out of random luck but if you do not own a legit XP, the safest bet is to look for MSkey4in1 and gen a new 640 key.

Edit: It seems that issued keys from MS are 640-0005xxx to 640-0006xxx so when using MSkey to gen a key choose Windows XP Pro VLK and set the range as 640-500 to 640-600.

Last edited by gabri3l; 07-15-2004 at 07:39.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2004, 00:01
c4p0ne's Avatar
c4p0ne c4p0ne is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: n/a
Posts: 83
Rept. Given: 1
Rept. Rcvd 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Rcvd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
c4p0ne Reputation: 1
Post

Here is the already BLOCKED PID Range in Windows XP/Home SP2.

XXXXX-640-0000356-23XXX
XXXXX-640-2001765-23XXX
XXXXX-640-643718x-23XXX
XXXXX-641-309376x-23XXX
XXXXX-642-064580x-23XXX
XXXXX-642-464364x-23XXX
XXXXX-643-334701x-23XXX
XXXXX-644-081772x-23XXX
XXXXX-644-451265x-23XXX
XXXXX-644-874896x-23XXX
XXXXX-644-933704x-23XXX
XXXXX-644-962396x-23XXX
XXXXX-645-833254x-23XXX
XXXXX-645-994962x-23XXX
XXXXX-646-031843x-23XXX
XXXXX-646-104081x-23XXX
XXXXX-646-105103x-23XXX
XXXXX-647-318838x-23XXX
XXXXX-647-592029x-23XXX
XXXXX-647-677834x-23XXX
XXXXX-648-301691x-23XXX
XXXXX-648-819992x-23XXX
XXXXX-649-106765x-23XXX
XXXXX-649-941392x-23XXX
XXXXX-650-292312x-23XXX

[courtasy of wzor, iexbeta, n1n0r... and beyond? ]

Last edited by c4p0ne; 07-16-2004 at 15:29.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2004, 03:00
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
Gosh. That list has a rather striking resemblance to the one posted on Worz.net yesterday.

Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2004, 03:13
gabri3l's Avatar
gabri3l gabri3l is offline
Parity Error 0x0FF2131D
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 118
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 10 Posts
gabri3l Reputation: 5
Which was first posted on iexbeta about 2 weeks ago. I think it is safe to assume that now everyone here knows what to change their key to, and how to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2004, 03:59
JMI JMI is offline
Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,627
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 199 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Rcvd at 98 Times in 96 Posts
JMI Reputation: 100-199 JMI Reputation: 100-199
And some of us actually have a legitimate key that doesn't need changing. Sometimes one can even talk M$ into giving a "real" key.

And gabri3l, the thread on ieXbeta may have been "started" on May 23, 2004, but the list they show there (as seen above) was posted by qapman on July 15, 2004 with a clickable link to the Worz.net page that was posted on July 14th. Credit should go where credit is due and if c4p0ne got it from there, or some other place, credit for the source should be mentioned. One would assume even Worz.net got it somewhere.


Regards,
__________________
JMI
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2004, 07:37
gabri3l's Avatar
gabri3l gabri3l is offline
Parity Error 0x0FF2131D
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 118
Rept. Given: 0
Rept. Rcvd 5 Times in 1 Post
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Rcvd at 21 Times in 10 Posts
gabri3l Reputation: 5
I was looking at this thread. hxxp://board.iexbeta.com/ibf10/index.php?showtopic=43587 But you raise an interesting point. I wonder where the list came from in the first place.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft site determines if WinXP is legit. �XC�PTiON™ General Discussion 6 09-30-2004 06:19


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 20:59.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )