![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is strange that you don't realize that this IS the bug-fixes you've been waiting for! Take a look at this list to see what are these fixes: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;811113
(I could count 818 bugfixes listed and some of the are cumulative fixes: i.e. more than one patch in the package). Do you realize that this is the Service Pack 2, which is a cumulative, huge set of bug-fixes over the previous Service Pack (SP1a, actually)? The things that holds some people back from installing SP2 is some possible incompatibilities with SHITTY programs (like some protection systems) that would like to do some strange things like executing code in stack which truely should be avioded. In my opinion it is plain wrong to not to install SP2 for such tiny reason (and guess what, those programs have no choice but to get updated anyway) against the huge security improvements SP2 can potentially have. Personally, I have installed SP2 and all of the programs installed on my computer are working with NO problem at all, and I tell, I have hundreds of programs installed... (And no, I don't do SoftICE on my XP machine: I have a separate, old Win2K machine with full DriverStudio for that purpose). So, what are you waiting for before installing SP2? Bug fixes for SP2? You mean SP3?? This whole thing has happened before, when SP1 was releazed and now is just being repeated again... Last edited by WARM3CH; 08-31-2004 at 00:36. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
WARM3CH: don't get too upset if some people are resilient to changes. they may have "shitty" reasons for not upgrading, but usually they are valid reasons.
have u ever experienced crashing your system after a service pack installation, or crashing an important application after you've patched? have you ever experienced trying to rebuild a pc, or reinstalling one from scratch because of a service pack upgrade? if you haven't, then lucky you... you can upgrade happily everytime there is a new release out there. but for some people, going through this again will be another nightmare i know they'll never ever want to experience again. it's a delicate balance, or imbalance. some may change, others may not. but one thing that's not good, is to force something to somebody. it'll all work out... i hope
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
my pc dont crash as often now after SP2 but the network activity is too much...i have Zone alarm ...even if i engage lock in Zone alarm my cable modem is showing activity...
WBR Surej |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
cable modems always show activity, you aren't just on your own segment you know, with a cable modem. Only DSL give you a true IP of your own.
And even if TCP/IP is locked, you can still have streams attempting to "get in", so hence network activity. -Lunar [EDIT JMI: Since a group of new users thought this was the perfect thread in which to post their personal opinions of XP2 to add to their post count, and all such comments had nothing to do with the subject of this Thread, I have deleted those and closed the Thread.] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| C# (Classic .exe, Windows 10, Windows Phone etc.) Protection | delidolunet | General Discussion | 7 | 10-11-2016 01:10 |
| (Q) .NET App Source Code Protection (Silverlight, Windows Phone, Windows 8) | delidolunet | General Discussion | 7 | 08-02-2013 10:33 |
| Dangerous blacklisted codes... | swetony | General Discussion | 6 | 09-09-2004 11:21 |
| Windows 2000 and Windows nt 4 sources, question | shady | General Discussion | 2 | 04-15-2004 04:17 |