Exetools  

Go Back   Exetools > General > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2004, 04:41
willcodeforfood
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Better then MS source

If you would like to play with/learn about how Windows NT/2K works and are put together, you should check out:
Reactos
These guys are building a binary compatible NT operating system from the ground up. An amazing amount of it is already in place inluding most of the low leve kernel support. Best of all, its an open source project.
Although it is not the source code to Windows, I have used it to determine how functions 'probably' work with great success.

WCFF
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2004, 05:11
goggles99 goggles99 is offline
Friend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 62
Rept. Given: 5
Rept. Rcvd 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Rcvd at 4 Times in 4 Posts
goggles99 Reputation: 0
WINE anyone?

I would take a good look at WINE.
They are much farther along then Reactos...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2004, 11:07
willcodeforfood
 
Posts: n/a
Reactos and Wine

Quote:
Originally Posted by goggles99
I would take a good look at WINE.
They are much farther along then Reactos...
Actually, much of the high level implementation (e.g. Above GDI) is shared between the Wine and Reactos projects. There are programmers on both projects that make sure changes are sync as Reactos is providing Wine with greatly enhanced low level compatiblity and Wine is providing a complete GUI layer for Reactos to run apps and their explorer shell.

The most interesting part of Reactos is the binary interface duplication all the way into the kernel level. Where wine calls linux/un*x system calls, essentially emulating a function, Reactos has built the exact same substrate within which all their code lies. Due to the API restrictions, much of the functional guts of the functions (esp, API functions) tend to match closely to Microsoft's code (per the DDK samples). The main differences has to do with side effects that Reactos must find to duplicate, which should not be relied on in the first place.

WCFF
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2004, 22:08
sumeru
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think it will work

AFAIK��The leaking code is not complete yet.

When the code leaked, I got it from net and check it rough.

It's obviously the leaking code is just a piece of the whole project.

BTW: Some shell App can compiled.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2004, 10:30
liaisons_
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Some more information on the source code is available from AndreaGeddon @ RET -- http://www.reteam.org/papers/e52.pdf

I've *some* of this paper and its really good. Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 2000 and Windows nt 4 sources, question shady General Discussion 2 04-15-2004 04:17
Windows 2000 Device Driver Book + Inside Windows 2000 at FTP dynio General Discussion 16 09-19-2003 23:21


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:51.


Always Your Best Friend: Aaron, JMI, ahmadmansoor, ZeNiX, chessgod101
( Since 1998 )