|
|
|
|
#2
07-01-2008, 23:41
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that software protections are dead, at least if concepted like armadillo, acprotect, obsidium, and so on.
The only one that are saved are the one with heavy virtual machine transformation like execryptor, themida and all VM-alike protections (private exe protector, vmprotect, ttprotect etc...) 
|
|
#3
07-02-2008, 07:59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aye, localized protections (those limited to client only) are a dying breed.
More and more custom protections are being seen requiring server-side activation and runtime requiring a server connection. REing won't go with them though. Waiting for the day when loaders handle TCP packet captures. Truly a new phase, rather than a deadening.
__________________
Even as darkness envelops and consumes us, wrapping around our personal worlds like the hand that grips around our necks and suffocates us, we must realize that life really is beautiful and the shadows of despair will scurry away like the fleeting roaches before the light.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How come new registrants given "guest" rank and not even a "friend" rank? | OldieHans | General Discussion | 4 | 09-25-2023 12:19 |
| When use "vendor defined encryption routines", how to set daemon related part? | bridgeic | General Discussion | 6 | 01-22-2015 11:35 |
| Wlscgen: Are "Vendor Id" and "Developer Id" different ? | Numega Softice | General Discussion | 6 | 02-12-2007 18:12 |
Hybrid Mode
