![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your thoughts. Can you explain then a bit more for me, as I am a n00b:
-If DEP is activated (like in XP SP2), a normal/unpacked program is a bit protected, because the stack/heap is not executable (return to libc still works). Now, you write "with UPX you have a section with RWE". Does this mean that without UPX you have some protection with DEP, but with UPX you do not? -What do you mean with "non movable target"? You see: My English is even worse ![]() boeser.hacker |
![]() |
| Tags |
| buffer overflow, exploit, packer |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stack Buffer Overflows | Dr.FarFar | General Discussion | 0 | 11-21-2023 18:04 |
| Buffer Overflow in SentinelLM Service | prt | General Discussion | 0 | 03-19-2005 05:20 |
| Creating a buffer overflow ? | Rhodium | General Discussion | 6 | 08-19-2003 04:39 |