![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see your point overflow, but thinking about it, couldn't the GetTickCount() function get robbed of CPU time and hence run slow?. All depends how it is implemented. If it reads a real time clock, or is interrupt driven then it should never return a low count. If it is just a queued task bumping a counter I think it could. In this example, the same applies to the Sleep() function.
Git |
| The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to Git For This Useful Post: | ||
oVERfLOW (09-04-2010) | ||
| Tags |
| sleep, time |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|