![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
@bridgeic: Just create a list of all files included, I really have no clue, probably you need .a or .elf files...
Greetings |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
As Kerlingen suggests you need the correct sig file for the compiler used. If it is an unusual compiler you will have to compile it yourself. One you have the .lib used to link in the openssl functions, use IDA's Flirt tools to convert .lib to .sig. Put the .sig in the sig directory and proceed to apply that sig to your disassembly. Many openssl functions should now be identified with the correct names.
Git |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have you read the instructions in your IDA/Flair/readme.txt ?
Git |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Git,
I mean I don't know which files of OpenSSL should be used as input of Flair/pelf, I have ever used flair on flexlm lib signature generation before, so know the basic usage. 2048bit RSA, any suggestion to crack to get private key? Or have to give up? Last edited by mr.exodia; 08-08-2014 at 01:38. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the key is properly generated then it is close to impossible. To create the correct .lib you must compile OpenSSL with the same compiler used to create the exe you are reversing, and for the same target (linux, win32, etc)
Git |
| The Following User Gave Reputation+1 to Git For This Useful Post: | ||
Storm Shadow (08-08-2014) | ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes would almost be inpossible to Brutecrack 2048bit RSA, if not impossible.
Youre only hope is to bypass(patch) the intire check for the RSA part. However There was some scientist that i read about last year that broke Rsa with sound gear, and cracked a 4096-bit RSA key Read about it here http://www.tau.ac.il/~tromer/acoustic/ |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
you need to DL the yara sigs https://github.com/zerklabs/yarasigs
unpack all to lets say c:\yara . Then edit the C:\Users\yourfolder\Downloads\ida\ida\plugins\IDAscope\idascope\config.py line Code:
"inspection": {
"default_semantics": "win-ring3"
},
"yara": {
"yara_sigs": ["C:\\yara"]
}
}
there are two options to perform crypto search. I use it to search for s-boxes and other , on Powerpc targets so defently work with linux targets also. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
configuration = { "config_path_sep": "\\", "plugin_only": False, "paths": { # "idascope_root_dir": "E:\\Program Files\\ida61\\plugins", "idascope_root_dir": "", "semantics_file": "idascope\\data\\semantics.json", "semantics_folder": "idascope\\data\\semantics", "winapi_keywords_file": "idascope\\data\\winapi_keywords.json", "winapi_rootdir": "C:\\WinAPI\\" }, "winapi": { "search_hotkey": "ctrl+y", "load_keyword_database": True, "online_enabled": True }, "inspection": { "default_semantics": "win-ring3" }, "yara": { "yara_sigs": ["C:\\yara"] } } And I have put yara sigs under c:\yara. Below message will be shown in IDA automatically after "file->script file->IDAScope.py", or I should do something else? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
if you do a yara scan
you will quickly see if the scanner is set proberly. you will see the yara rules load after push button peform yara scan Code:
loading rules from file: C:\yara\cve.yar (3) loading rules from file: C:\yara\index.yar (0) loading rules from file: C:\yara\xplug.yar (2) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\apt.yar (72) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\avdetect.yar (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\dbgdetect.yar (3) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\hangover.yar (16) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\sandboxdetect.yar (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\vmdetect.yar (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\APT_NGO_wuaclt\yara\APT_NGO_wuaclt.yar (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\APT_NGO_wuaclt\yara\APT_NGO_wuaclt_PDF.yar (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\Georbot\GeorBotBinary.yara (1) loading rules from file: C:\yara\AlienVault\Georbot\GeorBotMemory.yara (1) [!] Performing YARA scan... Also you can add you own sigs to yara read this post https://hacking.ventures/rsa-keys-in-heartbleed-memory/ he adds the RSA headers to the scanner Code:
rules = yara.compile(sources = {
'x509' : 'rule x509 {strings: $a = {30 82 ?? ?? 30 82 ?? ??} condition: $a}',
'pkcs' : 'rule pkcs {strings: $a = {30 82 ?? ?? 02 01 00} condition: $a}',
})
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Which file I should put this rule into? I try name a new rule file as rsa.yar, but seems failed to load. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
A RSA modulus has no special format and cannot be found by looking for some signature, since there is none. It is just a block of random looking bytes and the only way to know it is a modulus would be either finding a reference to it as an RSA parameter or by trying to factorize it (including all possible memory encodings) and not finding any factors after some minutes.
Did you yet find out if RSA is even used in your software and not just included as part of the library? It's a bit pointless to search for something which is not there, isn't it? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
make a file called Rsa.yar
remember to add it to the index file Code:
rule Rsa
{
strings:
$a = {30 82 ?? ?? 30 82 ?? ??} // x509 OpenSSL 1024 Cert public key
$b = {30 82 ?? ?? 02 01 00} // pkcs OpenSSL 1024 bit RSA Private Key
condition:
$a or $b
}
Bridge found the public rsa key that way in post 16 http://forum.exetools.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=16 but offcause it could be ofuscated and embedded in other files these days, and very hard to find https://b161268c3bf5a87bc67309e7c870...ARA-Manual.pdf Yara is almost a own script langueg by itself. Last edited by Storm Shadow; 08-09-2014 at 17:42. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, it is not. It is possible to find SSL signatures from memory, since SSL certificates have a known layout.
If you find a SSL certificate, you know where to look for the RSA modulus. But since SSL certificates are - like the name suggests - used for HTTPS connections over SSL/TLS, you will never use one for keygenning or software protection. In software protection or keygenning you might use RSA, but then you will only use RSA, never SSL, therefore you will never have any SSL certificates involved, so it's not possible to find them by some signature matching algorithm. |
| The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to Kerlingen For This Useful Post: | ||
bridgeic (08-15-2014), Storm Shadow (08-09-2014) | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, I guess the public key is just fixed strings with base64 format without other information(I still haven't checked details how the software give the public key, but I guess it should use this way), software owner keep the private key that is not in the software, so we may can't get the private key from public key for it's 2048 bit long.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes but now i have been talking about SSL Cert all along, and since he found the public signatures i asume he is looking for cetificates.
Bridge must answer for this, not me.Im only trying to help the dude. as i stated in a previus post it would be impossible to break anyway. Last edited by Storm Shadow; 08-09-2014 at 18:58. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Find the Algorithm | mcr4ck | General Discussion | 3 | 05-26-2020 18:19 |
| Find the Algorithm | mcr4ck | General Discussion | 18 | 02-06-2020 15:43 |