![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm agree with you , because till now I could not found any serial or patch for EXECryptor ver 2.x till 2.1.8 ... and the question : WHY ?? Their is a serial or patch for ASProtect and for others ... !! Is it that strong ? or no one know about it ? Other thing , while searching crackmes.de , I found a post for more than 2 months with no crack !! protected with EXECryptor !! So, what do you think ?? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
buy that, share serial & than we will have serial..
in other ways, if there is no serial yet, so maybe no ones buy.. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Asprotect > Armadillo
Reasons: it is more stable. Armadillo general idea is bad, ugly and slow. Execryptor is completely another concept, but it can be reversed, though it is NOT that easy
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anything that adds ~430KB to EXE's I would consider ugly anyway
ASProtect Overhead seems to be maybe 100K with a better compresion algo.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the replies. Since EXECryptor was mentioned a few times I gave it a good try and ended up purchasing both Armadillo, EXEProtector and the upgrade of ASProtect to v2.
I'll have to run some more tests to decide which one I'll use to protect the new versions of my software. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASProtect 1.x vs 2.x protection strength | smartins | General Discussion | 7 | 12-02-2004 00:21 |