![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
All the major hacks and Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) stats show that AV solutions don't work; sure it might flag a really really well-known malware family in your mailbox or dubious website; but any 0day variant will - by definition - not be detected; even heuristics won't help much for bigger campaigns (malware developers test as well you know
)It's also shockingly easy to take any random well known malware family and make it undetectable; it's even - probably the easiest - part of the OSCE exam. Then add the fact that for performance reasons it will not even detect really old malware anymore and performance-impact is still noticable; I can't recommend ANY (locally installed) antivirus/malware solution to start with. Even very expensive enterprise ones still have false positives and true negatives and thus using AV-solutions can actually give a false sense of security; you're not as secure as you think your are. Have it on the mailserver doesn't really hurt; but for local stuff, just do your updates, use a restricted account and the OS built-in firewall (assuming recent OSes, not talking WinXP here). For playing with untrusted downloads just use a VM with optionally Sandboxie within that VM and rollback to your snapshot afterwards, just to be sure. For non-tech savy people / "end users", just scare them to death to never ever click any fake updates, download or bill they got sent by e-mail and install the AV that got first place in a big AV test for this Quarter (like: best effort for the given moment). |
| The Following User Says Thank You to SKiLLa For This Useful Post: | ||
niculaita (11-01-2017) | ||
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Black Hat USA 2017 | TechLord | General Discussion | 4 | 08-31-2017 12:48 |
| Best Antivirus Engine | mantovano | General Discussion | 102 | 02-16-2011 18:13 |
| Antivirus API | just4urim | General Discussion | 4 | 02-06-2005 02:49 |