![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
this is the snippet:
Quote:
Quote:
pop ebx,pop ecx, pop ebp, are restoring what is pushed at the beginning,eax is xored right after retun, so by changing push ebp, to return is equal in effect to your nopping. and I see no differnce between what I did ,and your nopping. regards. Last edited by britedream; 03-22-2004 at 04:54. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
popeyfan ,
did you do the test I told you, run target outside olly. the startup codes look ok to me , but I don't have the same va so the value to move to eax, I will not be able to say if it is the right one or not. btw, are you runnig windows xp. can you send me your dump I will check it for you. regrads. Last edited by britedream; 03-22-2004 at 04:36. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, I did try running in & out of Olly, I'll email you my dumped file to check, thanks for that, very good of you.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, you can access it at hxxp://members.optusnet.com.au/~vincewmb/Aussiepompeyfan/RegDefrag.rar, I see I cant email you, so I uploaded it to my website.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks like my ISP doesn't like that file, you can get it from here, I've put it on the AR Cracking FTP, hxxp://www.grinders.withernsea.com/tools/RegDefrag.zip
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just downloaded the dump, double clicked on it , and it sarts the same way as mine, it gives a warning msg., then registration reminder,after clicking ok it ran.
I checked the version, both have the same one,"5.5283". I am running windows xp. Last edited by britedream; 03-22-2004 at 12:05. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
the only thing I can think of right now is that your target may be expired, so it is excuting different code that produced errors you have. it wasn't that either, I force it to expired, but the registration reminder came up fine .
Last edited by britedream; 03-22-2004 at 16:48. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, upon rereading what you first posted here, when you said 'so change 55 "push ebp", to c3 " retn"', for some reason I thought you were referring to the instruction at 410419, not the one at 41040C. Hence my comments about corrupting the stack (which now turn out are entirely irrelevant)... Sorry, my misunderstanding, my fault. Maybe I should slow down when reading next time, so I don't get confused so easily and throw off the whole thread. ![]() Regards, Satyric0n |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with ASProtect 1.23 RC4 | Perdition | General Discussion | 7 | 06-09-2004 01:48 |
| New Asprotect?? | loman | General Discussion | 7 | 02-04-2004 20:34 |