![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's also what I "assumed" from the NFO, which, however, leaves me wondering about the RSA-576 reference I mentioned above, which involved only "174" digits, rather than 576 bits.
Sort of seems like the protection might more correctly be called a "525 bit key", rather that RSA-525, but again, I am no expert in this field and never liked "math" very much. Regards,
__________________
JMI |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VS 6 question(s)... | newguy | General Discussion | 9 | 04-22-2004 19:49 |
| Question to JMI | Rhodium | General Discussion | 1 | 02-20-2004 06:16 |