![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you use this debugger? | |||
| Yes (mainly x32) |
|
97 | 29.04% |
Not at all
|
|
25 | 7.49% |
| Yes, if it gets better (please post feature suggestions) |
|
90 | 26.95% |
| Yes (mainly x64) |
|
122 | 36.53% |
| Voters: 334. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
@ferrit.rce: thanks in advance for that!
@Jerry: you're right, I wanted to change it, but I was too late to edit the post (maybe one of the admins could do that?) @ahmadmansoor: great you want to join, of course you are welcome! As for the development time x32 and x64 require (almost) no different code. In fact, porting the GUI from x64->x32 took a few minutes ![]() Our aim is indeed to add features like ollyDbg, our design is very different though (GUI and DBG are separate, so bugs can be easily fixed without having to recompile all modules) also the plugin architecture is going to be very different (currently there are only some ideas but there will be many types/places to add plugins to) Also, a new release available in public_bin. Changelog: - added Scylla 'plugin' (start scylla with the current process/dll you have loaded) - fixed many GUI bugs (redraw bugs etc), by Sigma - fixed this disassembly bug with truncated QWORDS Download in the repo Greetings |
| The Following 2 Users Gave Reputation+1 to mr.exodia For This Useful Post: | ||
chessgod101 (10-29-2013), Youtoo (11-15-2013) | ||
| Tags |
| bit, debugger, x32, x64, x64_dbg |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debug with x64dbg | dnvthv | General Discussion | 2 | 03-22-2025 21:49 |
| Add .lib file on x64dbg ? | LaDidi | General Discussion | 0 | 02-18-2022 14:39 |
| DBG2AP - x64dbg plugin | Agmcz | Community Tools | 1 | 06-15-2019 07:14 |
| nfd - x64dbg plugin | hors | Community Tools | 2 | 04-01-2018 08:18 |
| x64dbg python | Storm Shadow | Developer Section | 6 | 08-04-2017 15:29 |